Loading...
  • 44ba41 branding logo pride1a

    @JakeArk It's linked on my 5mods profile, and it should be linked in the .rar file

    8 days ago
  • 44ba41 branding logo pride1a

    @Wildmandan Of course, provided it is all done correctly it shouldn’t be a problem.

    June 10, 2021
  • 44ba41 branding logo pride1a

    @Nachtfliege just one, located near the skateboard park.

    June 04, 2021
  • 44ba41 branding logo pride1a

    @Unsearchably Lmao, whatever you say 🤡
    Your lack of a coherent response and this continued deflecting only makes me wonder what criticism you were expecting for making such a silly comment.
    Begone troll.

    June 04, 2021
  • 44ba41 branding logo pride1a
  • 44ba41 branding logo pride1a

    @Unsearchably Do you suffer from retrograde amnesia or something? It was in response to a rather stupid comment you made which has since been removed.

    June 04, 2021
  • 44ba41 branding logo pride1a

    @Unsearchably Okay let’s get this straight, shall we, because you seem to be wildly lost.

    The criticism I expect, is the same for any developer who uploads here, and likewise is the same that site staff expect, this should be of no surprise to anybody. But for the sake of clarification, what I expect is: Constructive criticism as to the quality of the contents of the mod, as per site guidelines which everyone agrees to, by default, by commenting/rating on here. Nothing more, nothing less.

    With that said, the criticism I had of a particular rating was not because of a lack of constructive criticism and/or baseless explanation - in fact I appreciated that someone had taken the time to actually give it a proper analysis and provide meaningful feedback. So whilst I recognise the subjectivity in regard to ones rating, the issue was it was that the rating (a 0.5/5) was very clearly skewed by a bias and was merely a continuance of the negativity that’s been thrown in the comments here - which I’ve said before and I’ll say again - was directed at what I’ll describe for now as a political bias of an external concept - not purely based on the actual quality of the contents of the modification itself - which I remind you is against server guidelines. The rectified rating is far more fair and a more accurate reflection of the feedback that was given, furthermore the fact it was changed only really further goes to show the validation of my complaint, and the lack thereof to your own rebuttal.

    As for this being a “low-effort mod”, I’d beg to differ. It was thought through and modelled off of a real-world inspiration. This wasn’t just thrown together from thin air in 5 minutes, the textures weren’t made using Microsoft Paint (and/or bucket tools), and you’ll find that LODs were included. Yes it may be simple enough in the grand scheme of things, it may not even be flawless, but that doesn’t make it “low effort”. If you’re going to go there, how about actually making your case?

    Finally, your “constructive criticism” falls flat I’m afraid.
    For starters you’re now out here suggesting I’d want ignorance... what the hell is that all about?
    Secondly you’re insinuating that somehow I’m the one that’s caused people to not reacting “more openly”. I’m sorry to say that all this, well let’s say more ‘closed’ reacting, has been happening long before I ever intervened or made a comment on the matter. All the folk who’ve chosen to suddenly rage at the sight of a mod that’s been published to the public domain, they’ve done that of their own volition. This has nothing to do to me.
    Lastly you talk about pandering, but all I’m seeing is a bunch of fools pandering to their own insecurities because they’ve seen what is fundamentally just a rainbow coloured retexture of a small otherwise relatively insignificant building in the game. You need not worry about my self awareness because that’s not the issue.

    This is a little tribute mod, which can be treated as a pride oriented mod, but by no means has to exclusively be treated as such. At the end of the day it really is just a recoloured hut. It’s uploaded to the public domain for people to install if they so wish too. This isn’t being forced upon anyone, and my actions aren’t the ones in violation of site guidelines.
    All I can say is that if this is enough to tick some people off then it really says much more about them than it does myself, and believe me, it shows.

    Expand to read the full comment
    June 03, 2021
  • 44ba41 branding logo pride1a

    @That Retro Guy Thanks for providing *actual* constructive criticism here, I mitigated this issue as best I could with the way in which I had gone about making this. Beyond the rather "smooth" looking textures, the UV related issues are miniscule to say the least.

    With that said, you and I both know that this does not equate to a .5 rating, this is nothing more than a continuation of the barage of .5/1 star ratings which is aimed not at the actual quality of the content of this mod, but based on ones opinions on what this modification symbolises. You're only further playing the fool by now trying to insult my intelliegence by using these minor flaws as a facade for your otherwise shitting on this modifcation unneccessarily.

    June 03, 2021
  • 44ba41 branding logo pride1a

    @korriio You can join my discord server here: https://www.discord.com/invite/WrDDMEFPMF
    As for "broken" lightbars, I assume you mean conflicting sirenIDs? If so, ensure you have the SirenSetting Limit Adjustrer mod installed: https://www.gta5-mods.com/scripts/sirensetting-limit-adjuster

    May 28, 2021
  • 44ba41 branding logo pride1a

    @X-ManFR I assume you're referring to the animations in the promo screenshots? All of them can be found in-game. It's just a case of keyword searching and digging around.

    May 25, 2021